Related

An MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheet) and an SDS (Safety Data Sheet) serve the same purpose: communicating chemical hazard information.

MSDS vs. SDS: What Changed and What Your Team Needs to Know

MSDS vs. SDS: What Changed and What Your Team Needs to Know
Global supply chain resilience in 2026: interconnected risks from geopolitical conflict, climate change, and cyber threats.

No Single Playbook: Why Integrated Threats Demand a New Model for Supply Chain Resilience

No Single Playbook: Why Integrated Threats Demand a New Model for Supply Chain Resilience
3E's Supplier SDS Loader available as part of the 3E ERC+, has been named a winner of the 2026 Occupational Health & Safety (OH&S) Industrial Hygiene Award

3E’s AI-Powered Supplier SDS Loader for SAP Wins 2026 OH&S Industrial Hygiene Award for SDS Management

3E’s AI-Powered Supplier SDS Loader for SAP Wins 2026 OH&S Industrial Hygiene Award for SDS Management
While research on the impact of microplastics increases, regulations struggle to keep pace

Microplastics in North America in 2026: Research Advances, Regulation Struggles to Keep Pace

Microplastics in North America in 2026: Research Advances, Regulation Struggles to Keep Pace

Negotiations at the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) 5.2 in Geneva have ended without an agreement on plastic pollution. Countries remain deadlocked over issues including restrictions on production, plastic reduction, and recycling.

Chair Luis Vayas Valdivieso presented two potential drafts to be used as the basis of negotiations during the session, with neither one receiving approval from delegates.

A high-ambition coalition of countries wants to reduce global plastic production to address the problem of plastic pollution in the environment. However, countries like Saudi Arabia, for whom production of petroleum-based plastic is a critical part of their economy, consider reductions out of scope for the negotiations and are pushing instead for better waste management and recycling programs to reduce pollution.

The new drafts tabled by the chair did not address a potential production cap for plastic, though they did recognize that current levels of production exceed the capacity of waste management programs and referred to them as “unsustainable.”

The reaction to the failure has been one of frustration.

“The inability to reach an agreement in Geneva must be a wake up call for the world: ending plastic pollution means confronting fossil fuel interests head on,” said Greenpeace Head of Delegation to the Global Plastics Treaty negotiations and Global Plastics Campaign Lead for Greenpeace USA Graham Forbes in a press release. “The vast majority of governments want a strong agreement, yet a handful of bad actors were allowed to use process to drive such ambition into the ground. We cannot continue to do the same thing and expect a different result. The time for hesitation is over.”

Failure Today but Hope for Tomorrow

While INC 5.2 ends without an agreement, Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Inger Andersen expressed hope that the setback is only a minor step backwards on a journey that will eventually end in a treaty, while emphasizing the high stakes of addressing plastic pollution.

“This has been a hard-fought 10 days against the backdrop of geopolitical complexities, economic challenges, and multilateral strains,” said Andersen in a statement from UNEP. “However, one thing remains clear: despite these complexities, all countries clearly want to remain at the table. While we did not land the treaty text we hoped for, we at UNEP will continue the work against plastic pollution – pollution that is in our groundwater, in our soil, in our rivers, in our oceans and yes, in our bodies.”

INC 5.2 had over 2,600 participants from 183 countries, including over 1,400 member delegates and more than 1,000 observers and lobbyists representing the plastics industry.

Researchers say that plastic production has doubled over the last two decades, reaching 450 million tonnes in 2019.

About 82 million tonnes of plastic becomes waste each year through mismanagement and litter. Of that figure, 19 million tonnes leaks into the environment, with 6 million tonnes going into rivers and coastlines. Plastics production is also responsible for about 3% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions each year.

Reporter

Graham Freeman

Graham Freeman is based in Toronto, where he covers ESG and sustainability news. Graham has been a content and technical writer in the technology industry for more than a decade. He has also worked as a professor and lecturer at Queen’s University, the University of Toronto, and George Brown College.
More content from Graham
Graham Freeman

Related Resources

News

MSDS vs. SDS: What Changed and What Your Team Needs to Know
MSDS vs. SDS: What Changed and What Your Team Needs to Know
Global supply chain resilience in 2026: interconnected risks from geopolitical conflict, climate change, and cyber threats.

News

No Single Playbook: Why Integrated Threats Demand a New Model for Supply Chain Resilience
No Single Playbook: Why Integrated Threats Demand a New Model for Supply Chain Resilience
Global supply chain resilience in 2026: interconnected risks from geopolitical conflict, climate change, and cyber threats.

News

3E’s AI-Powered Supplier SDS Loader for SAP Wins 2026 OH&S Industrial Hygiene Award for SDS Management
3E’s AI-Powered Supplier SDS Loader for SAP Wins 2026 OH&S Industrial Hygiene Award for SDS Management
While research on the impact of microplastics increases, regulations struggle to keep pace

News

Microplastics in North America in 2026: Research Advances, Regulation Struggles to Keep Pace
Microplastics in North America in 2026: Research Advances, Regulation Struggles to Keep Pace

View All 3E Resources

View All 3E Resources